Alternative Proteins and Dairy Replacements
The Rise of Plant-Based and Beyond
As the demand for sustainable, allergen-friendly, and ethically produced food grows, fitness professionals are seeing a significant shift in client preferences toward alternative proteins and dairy replacements. From oat milk lattes to mushroom-based burgers and lab-grown meat, the nutrition landscape is evolving rapidly. This evolution is driven not only by ethical and environmental concerns, but also by a broader understanding of food intolerances, digestive health, and diverse dietary patterns.
Fitness pros must understand the science, sourcing, and nutritional implications of these alternatives to make informed recommendations that align with client goals and values. Let’s discuss current trends in plant-based and alternative proteins, explain why these changes matter, and take a look at practical coaching strategies to incorporate them effectively into fitness and nutrition plans.
What’s Hot: Diverse and Innovative Protein Sources
The alternative protein market is thriving, driven by innovation, environmental necessity, and changing consumer behavior. What was once a niche interest has exploded into mainstream availability, with grocery shelves and cafes stocked with options that go far beyond tofu and almond milk. Key trends include:
- Plant-Based Milks: Oat and hemp milk have become top choices due to their creamy texture, nutritional value, and environmental benefits. Oat milk, in particular, is popular in cafes for its neutral taste and foam-friendly quality, making it a barista favorite. Hemp milk offers omega-3 fatty acids, magnesium, and complete protein, making it a suitable allergen-free alternative for individuals with nut or soy allergies (McClements et al., 2021). These milks are often fortified with calcium, vitamin D, and B12 to match or exceed the nutrient profile of cow’s milk.
- Fermented Meat Alternatives: These include foods like tempeh, koji-based meats, and mycoprotein such as Quorn. Fermentation not only enhances digestibility and nutrient availability but also introduces probiotics that can benefit gut health. Their hearty texture and umami flavor make them appealing to meat-eaters looking for occasional plant-based swaps without compromising satisfaction. These options are particularly valuable for clients focused on both gut health and satiety.
- Lab-Grown Proteins: Also called cultivated or cultured meat, these proteins are grown from animal cells in bioreactors without the need to raise or slaughter animals. Though not widely available yet, lab-grown meat holds promise for clients who value the taste and nutritional quality of animal protein but seek more ethical and sustainable choices. Current research is focused on scaling production and achieving cost parity (Post et al., 2020).
- Hybrid Products: A middle-ground solution blending animal and plant proteins—such as mushroom-beef burgers—caters to flexitarians and transitional eaters. These products often have a lower environmental footprint than traditional meat and can reduce saturated fat intake while maintaining a familiar taste and mouthfeel.
Why It Matters: Aligning Nutrition with Values and Needs
The relevance of alternative proteins is about more than just nutrition—it’s about lifestyle alignment, accessibility, and planetary health:
- Sustainability: Traditional animal agriculture contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, water usage, and land degradation. By contrast, plant-based proteins typically require fewer resources, making them a more sustainable choice. A study by Poore and Nemecek (2018) found that switching to plant-based alternatives could reduce food-related environmental impact by over 70%.
- Allergen-Friendly and Inclusive: Lactose intolerance affects an estimated 65% of the global population, making dairy alternatives essential. Oat, hemp, almond, pea, and rice-based milks offer options for those avoiding dairy, soy, or nuts. These inclusive options allow fitness professionals to make personalized recommendations that meet diverse client needs without compromise.
- Digestive Comfort: Many clients experience digestive discomfort from traditional whey or casein proteins. Fermented and plant-based proteins can provide a gentler option, often accompanied by fiber or probiotics that support gut health. This is especially important for clients with IBS, food sensitivities, or autoimmune concerns.
- Ethical Considerations: The rising awareness around animal welfare has pushed many consumers to seek out cruelty-free options. For clients who are motivated by ethical eating, providing suitable plant-based or lab-grown alternatives supports their values without sacrificing nutritional adequacy.
Practical Coaching Tips for Fit Pros
- Understand Nutrient Density: Encourage clients to choose products that are fortified with calcium, vitamin D, B12, and omega-3s. Help them avoid “empty” alternatives that mimic the appearance of dairy or meat but offer little nutritional value. For example, compare an unsweetened fortified soy milk with an unfortified almond milk to demonstrate the importance of label reading.
- Assess Protein Quality: Unlike animal proteins, many plant proteins are not complete sources of amino acids. Guide clients in combining complementary proteins throughout the day—such as pairing whole grains with legumes or nuts with seeds—to ensure they meet their muscle-building and recovery needs. This is particularly important for athletes, aging clients, and those in caloric deficit phases.
- Read Labels with Clients: Many alternative products contain thickeners, stabilizers, added sugars, and excessive sodium. During coaching sessions, take time to evaluate labels together and teach clients what to look for. Recommend options with fewer than 10 ingredients and no artificial colors or preservatives whenever possible.
- Support Digestive Transitions: Clients shifting to a higher fiber intake or trying new fermented foods may experience temporary bloating or digestive shifts. Encourage them to introduce new items gradually, stay hydrated, and consider taking digestive enzymes if needed. Reassure them that their microbiome often needs a few weeks to adapt.
- Bridge the Gap for Performance Clients: Reassure clients that performance nutrition is possible with plant-forward diets. Highlight options like pea protein isolate, textured vegetable protein (TVP), soy, and mycoprotein, all of which support muscle recovery and satiety. Refer to studies like Van Vliet et al. (2015), which confirm that plant-based proteins can stimulate muscle protein synthesis comparably to animal sources when consumed in adequate amounts.
Leading with Knowledge and Flexibility
Alternative proteins and dairy replacements are no longer niche trends—they’re staples in many clients’ lives. Whether your client is plant-curious, a committed vegan, managing allergies, or looking to reduce their carbon footprint, you have the tools to guide them.
Understanding the nutritional quality, functional application, and personal motivations behind these choices allows fitness professionals to elevate their coaching. Rather than prescribing one-size-fits-all plans, you can offer adaptable, science-backed strategies that respect individual values and deliver results.
Stay informed, stay curious, and help your clients make choices that are both nourishing and aligned with their lifestyles.
References
McClements, D. J., Grossmann, L., & Liu, C. (2021). Plant-based milks: A review of the science underpinning their design, fabrication, and performance. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 20(4), 3504-3525.
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987-992.
Post, M. J., Levenberg, S., Kaplan, D. L., Genovese, N., Fu, J., Bryant, C. J., … & Tibbit, M. (2020). Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nature Food, 1(7), 403-415.
Van Vliet, S., Burd, N. A., & van Loon, L. J. (2015). The skeletal muscle anabolic response to plant- versus animal-based protein consumption. The Journal of Nutrition, 145(9), 1981-1991.


