Think of a recent time you felt stressed. Maybe it was during an argument with your spouse, or a meltdown with your kids. Maybe you were stuck in traffic and late for an important meeting. Or maybe you were lying in bed, worrying about work. Whatever the cause of your stress, your body and brain were almost certainly experiencing the same thing: boiling blood pressure, a churning stomach, tight muscles and a racing mind.
We all recognize this feeling of stress. It’s more than a mental state; it’s a full-blown mind-body response. When stress takes hold, the brain is bathed in chemicals that heighten our senses and focus our attention, making it impossible for us to think about anything else. The sympathetic nervous system gets a jump-start, and stress hormones like adrenaline and cortisol make us feel even more wired. Glucose and fats flood the bloodstream, and our cardiovascular and respiratory systems rev up, all to give us the energy we need to deal with the stress.
These changes would make sense if we were running for our lives or rescuing our child from a fire. But when everything from taxes to television news triggers a reactive response, stress becomes toxic. Chronic stress increases the risk for a wide range of health problems, in large part because the body’s response to stress adds up over time (McEwen 2006). Chronic inflammation and sympathetic activation contribute to autoimmune disorders, chronic pain and cardiovascular disease. Elevated blood glucose and fat levels raise the risk of insulin resistance and diabetes. Chronic exposure to stress hormones suppresses the immune system, kills off brain cells and promotes obesity. When any unwanted physical or psychological condition is present, chances are that stress plays a role.
And yet, not everyone is equally susceptible. Some people seem to be protected from the worst effects of stress. These resilient folks handle stress better and recover from stress more quickly. Science is beginning to reveal the secrets of stress resilience and to learn what it looks like in the brain and body. It turns out we can measure stress resilience in the heart, the nervous system (which includes the brain) and even our DNA. We can also train resilience—even in the face of chronic stress.
This article explores the new biology of stress resilience, how it protects against stress-related diseases, and why exercise may be the best way to train it.
Our Resilient Heart
For many, the heart is where we first feel stress. We sense it speeding up or pounding in our chests. The heart is also where researchers discovered the body’s best biological indicator of stress resilience: heart rate variability.
Although we typically describe heart rate with one number (e.g., 70 beats per minute), heart rate naturally fluctuates from moment to moment; in other words, across those 70 heartbeats, the time between beats varies slightly. When the autonomic nervous system is balanced between sympathetic and parasympathetic activation, HRV coordinates with the breath. The time between heartbeats gets shorter when we inhale and longer when we exhale. This kind of HRV is not only normal; it’s a sign of cardiovascular health (Thayer et al. 2011; Thayer, Yamamoto & Brosschot 2010). It means the body is not stuck in a chronic fight-or-flight response. For this reason, HRV is sometimes referred to as autonomic resilience.
Researchers have discovered that people with greater resting HRV respond better to stress than people with lower HRV (Thayer et al. 2011). The former cope better with mental, emotional and social stress; adapt more quickly to stressful environments; and recover more quickly from stressful experiences (Souza et al. 2007). HRV appears to be a kind of “resilience reserve” that buffers against the physiological and psychological toll of stressful experiences. Psychological disorders defined by their loss of stress resilience—including depression and posttraumatic stress disorder—are associated with chronically lower HRV (Dedert et al. 2010; Stapelberg et al. 2012).
Does Exercise Increase HRV?
A growing body of research demonstrates that regular physical activity can increase resting HRV. For example, a recent study examined the effects on HRV of 12 weeks of intermittent aerobic exercise (20 minutes, 3 times per week) in a group of previously sedentary young men (mean age = 24.9 ± 4.3 years) with an average body mass index of 28.7 ± 3.1 (Heydari, Boutcher & Boutcher 2012). The workout consisted of indoor cycling at 80%–90% of maximum heart rate interspersed with recovery periods. Men in the exercise group showed an increase in baseline/resting HRV, while men in the control group showed no change.
Obesity is commonly associated with lower HRV (de Souza et al. 2012), but research indicates that exercise can increase HRV in obese individuals. Overweight and obese middle-aged men and women who participated in a 12-week aerobic cycling program (30 minutes, 3 times per week) experienced an increase in HRV (Amano et al. 2001). In another study, obese women who had recently undergone gastric bypass surgery showed an increase in HRV after 12 weeks of aerobic treadmill exercise (1 hour, 3 times per week) (Castello et al. 2011).
Medical researchers have begun to view HRV training as a key goal in treating stress-related disorders such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, and exercise as a proven method for doing so. A 2010 review paper (Routledge et al. 2010) identified 18 studies demonstrating that exercise increases HRV among people with stress-related disorders. The exercise interventions in these studies varied widely, ranging in length from 4 weeks to 6 months, with workouts as diverse as unsupervised walking and carefully structured indoor cycling. The one common feature of all programs was that they involved some form of cardiovascular exercise.
How Much Exercise Is Enough?
A study of overweight and obese postmenopausal women found that moderate exercise was sufficient to improve HRV (Earnest et al. 2008). The subjects—373 previously sedentary women, aged 45–75—were randomly assigned to 6 months of exercise training at 50%, 100% or 150% of the minimal physical activity levels recommended by the National Institutes of Health. Exercise improved HRV, but the dose-response relationship was nonlinear. Exercising at the 50% level did not increase HRV; benefits occurred at the 100% level; but the most active group gained no additional benefits.
A correlational study of adolescents found a similar association between moderate physical activity and higher HRV (Radkte et al. 2012). The teens in this study wore an accelerometer for 8 days and an HRV monitor for one 24-hour period. Those who engaged in more frequent physical activity had higher 24-hour HRV than less active students. But this finding held true only for moderate physical activity; greater high-intensity activity did not correlate with higher HRV.
Together, these results suggest that resilience training can begin with modest increases in activity. In the teen study (Radkte et al. 2012), only 17 minutes of daily activity separated those with high HRV from those with low HRV. As we explore other aspects of stress resilience, this will be a common theme: More exercise, or more intense training, is not necessarily better.
Our Resilient DNA
Scientists have recently discovered that stress resilience (like stress itself) goes much deeper than the signs of stress we easily feel or see. It goes all the way down to our DNA, the genetic material—present in every cell—that holds the so-called blueprint for life. The latest research suggests that stress can damage DNA and increase our risk of age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease (Aubert & Lansdorp, 2008; Willeit et al. 2010). Fortunately, exercise can protect our DNA, slow down the body’s aging process and reduce the risk of age-related diseases.
Telomeres: The Guardians of Your DNA
You may remember from biology class that the body’s cells replicate themselves throughout our lifespan. Each time a cell replicates, it loses a bit of its DNA. To make sure that cells don’t lose important DNA, the ends of chromosomes are padded with extra sequences of spare DNA. These protective ends are called telomeres. The spare DNA can be sacrificed without damaging the cells’ ability to replicate. In this way, telomeres preserve the integrity of our DNA (Aubert & Lansdorp, 2008; Willeit et al. 2010).
However, as we age and cells repeatedly turn over, our telomeres get shorter. This can lead to cell death and dysfunction. Telomere length has become a cutting-edge biological measure of a person’s true biological age (Fyhrquist & Saijonmaa 2012). Telomere length is associated with remaining lifespan, as well as a wide range of age-related diseases, from cancer to cognitive decline (Ludlow & Roth 2011; Yaffe et al. 2011).
Scientists have discovered that time is not the only thing that shortens telomeres. Psychological stress speeds up the rate of telomere shortening and slows down the body’s process for repairing telomeres (Blackburn & Epel 2012). In fact, much of what we think of as age-related decline may actually be due to the effects of stress on telomeres. But this effect is not inevitable. New research reveals that telomere shortening can be prevented—and even reversed—through stress reduction and healthy lifestyle changes (Epel 2012).
While anything that reduces stress can have a positive effect, physical exercise may have a particularly potent impact on telomere length. One study analyzed the relationship between physical activity and telomere length in 2,401 adults (mostly women, with an average age of 48.8 ± 12.9). Regular exercisers had longer telomeres than nonexercisers, and the average difference in length was equivalent to 10 years of biological age (Cherkas et al. 2008). Another study found that greater cardiovascular fitness, as measured by a treadmill test, was associated with longer telomeres (Krauss et al. 2011).
Exercise even seems to erase the usual association between higher levels of psychological stress and shorter telomeres. In one study, sedentary postmenopausal women who reported greater stress had significantly shorter telomeres. However, among women who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendations for physical activity, there was no correlation between stress and telomere length (Puterman et al. 2010).
Moderation Wins Again
As we saw for heart rate variability, the benefits of exercise on telomere length appear to be strongest with moderate levels of exercise. Among middle-aged and older adults, physical activity is associated with longer telomeres, but only up to an average expenditure of 2,341–3,540 kilocalories per week (which equates to about 10 hours of walking or other light activity per week). One study found that adults reporting higher levels of activity had telomere lengths equivalent to the least active participants (Ludlow et al. 2008).
Another study tracked 204 middle-aged men from 1974 to 2003 and used 1974 activity levels to predict telomere length in 2003. Researchers grouped the men into three categories: light activity (mainly reading, watching television or movies, and other sedentary activities), moderate activity (e.g., walking, cycling, skiing, gardening or other light exercise at least once a week) and vigorous activity (e.g., running, vigorous exercise or competitive sports several times a week). Moderate, but not vigorous, activity in midlife predicted longer telomeres in old age, compared with the light-activity group (Savela et al. 2013). These findings suggest, again, that crossing the line from sedentary to active is the most reliable way to increase stress resilience.
The Resilient Brain
Psychological stress begins in the brain when we perceive a threat. The brain triggers the body’s fight-or-flight stress response and directs the process of stress recovery. It should be no surprise, then, that the search for the biology of stress resilience must include the brain.
How Stress Shapes the Brain’s Stress Circuit
Three regions of the brain control the stress response: the amygdala, which detects threat and triggers the fight-or-flight response; the prefrontal cortex, which helps us deal calmly with stress, and can prevent or shut down a fight-or-flight response; and the hippocampus, which supports stress recovery (McEwen & Gianaros 2010).
Neuroscientists now know that chronic stress can change these brain regions in a way that makes us more sensitive and less resilient to stress (Ganzel, Morris & Wethington 2010; McEwen & Gianaros 2010). For example, high levels of stress hormones are neurotoxic to the prefrontal cortex or hippocampus, can reduce the connections between brain cells and can even kill brain cells. As these areas weaken, the brain gets worse at managing stress. Chronic stress has the opposite effect on the amygdala, the brain’s threat detector. Repeated stress can actually make the amygdala grow, increasing connections between brain cells and heightening cell excitability. This makes the brain even more reactive to stress. These brain changes are associated with, and likely contribute to, a range of stress-related disorders, from depression to cardiovascular disease and accelerated aging (Ganzel, Morris, & Wethington 2010).
How Exercise Changes the Brain
Exercise has shown tremendous promise as a neuroprotective intervention (Fleshner et al. 2011; Head, Singh & Bugg, 2012; McEwen 2012). Research has identified several ways that exercise protects the brain from stress—and even reverses the effects of chronic stress on the brain (Stranahan & Mattson 2012; Rothman & Mattson 2012). Exercise increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which maintains brain health, supports brain growth and combats the negative effects of stress. Exercise seems to enhance BDNF specifically in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, the two regions most susceptible to stress-related damage. Exercise also triggers the brain’s self-repair processes, which may help reverse any stress-related neurotoxicity. Finally, exercise activates the brain’s stress-calming system, releasing a neurotransmitter called GABA, which helps restore balance in the autonomic nervous system. When we exercise regularly, we naturally engage all of these neuroprotective processes. Over time, exercise can create a “stress-resistant” brain that is less sensitive to threat and recovers more quickly from stress (Fleshner et al. 2011).
Finding the Right Dose of Exercise
Several recent reports have focused attention on the potential health risks of extreme training. While moderate exercise improves cardiovascular health, intense workouts lasting longer than 2 hours can cause temporary damage to the heart, and over time, can lead to dangerous remodeling of the heart’s structure (O’Keefe et al. 2012; O’Keefe & Lavie 2012). A major review of exercise’s effects on the immune system found that moderate exercise enhances immunity, but higher levels suppress it and increase the risk of illness and infection (Walsh et al. 2011a).
The same pattern holds true for stress resilience. While moderate physical activity is associated with lower levels of stress hormones and faster recovery from stress, the protective effect disappears with intense and prolonged training. Exercise becomes another form of chronic stress (Walsh et al. 2011b). The overtrained athlete may develop an exaggerated stress response to exercise, fail to recover between workouts, and show chronically elevated levels of stress hormones. When this happens, exercise amplifies rather than protects against the health risks of psychological stress.
Of course, there are many reasons to work out, and some goals require intense training. If this is true for you or your clients, it’s important to look for ways to support not only physical workout recovery but also general stress management (Walsh et al. 2011b). Mind-body practices, sleep habits, diet and strategies from positive psychology can all play a role in reducing psychological stress and improving resilience.
Is Exercise Good Stress?
This article has painted a pretty negative picture of stress. It makes you sick, gives you brain damage and hastens aging. But while chronic stress can be toxic, not all stress is bad for you. Some stress can actually make you more resilient to stress. Scientists call this kind of good stress hormesis (Mattson 2008). The principle of good stress works like this: When a biological system is challenged, it is forced to adapt and learn from that experience. As a fitness professional, you use this principle every time you design a workout to train strength or endurance. Following the same logic, under the right conditions, stressful experiences can teach the brain and body how to handle future stress in a healthier way.
What makes a stressful experience helpful instead of toxic? The theory of good stress argues for a U-shaped curve, with the most benefit coming from moderate doses of stress with ample recovery time (Mattson 2008; Radak et al. 2008). Too little stress does not challenge a system enough to trigger positive adaptation, but too much stress overwhelms a system and leads to negative adaptations. As was true for Goldilocks, “just right” is somewhere in the middle. Good stress challenges us without exhausting our resources.
Some scientists believe that this concept of “good stress” is the best way to understand how physical activity—especially moderate aerobic exercise, with ample recovery time—trains stress resilience (Radak et al. 2008). Aerobic exercise closely parallels the fight-or-flight response, and stress hormones typically surge during a workout (Hackney 2006; Walsh et al. 2011b). But as fitness levels increase, the brain and body become more efficient. There is a smaller rise in stress hormones during training, and recovery happens more quickly following exercise (Hackney 2006; Walsh et al. 2011b).
Proponents of the good-stress theory believe that this kind of “stress learning” isn’t limited to the workout session or immediate recovery. The process of recovering from exercise stress creates a stress-resistant brain that knows how to handle any kind of stress, including mental and social challenges (Amat et al. 2006; Greenwood et al. 2012). This can be helpful to remember when you’re out on a tough run or when your cycling class participants are feeling their physical limits. Getting through that stress will do more than improve your fitness; it will help you and your clients meet the next stressful situation with greater strength and resilience.
The Psychology of Stress Resilience
Much of the research on exercise and the brain has been conducted on nonhuman animals—for example, by giving rats running wheels in their cages and letting them run whenever they want to, or by making them tread water for a fixed period. This animal research has turned up a surprising finding about the importance of choice when it comes to training the brain (Dishman et al. 2006; Fleshner et al. 2011). The biggest brain benefits are observed when animals get to choose when and how much to exercise, not when they are forced into a fixed-activity session.
It’s always risky to generalize from rodents to humans, but when it comes to stress resilience, physical exertion may not be enough. It helps to have a sense of autonomy and control. In the case of animal research, that means there’s no experimenter making sure a rat doesn’t get off a treadmill. For humans, it might mean finding the workout you want to do, instead of viewing exercise as something you have to do. Or it could mean learning to find your own motivation, rather than relying on a drill-sergeant coach to scare you into compliance. When training clients, give them choices and acknowledge their willingness to work out. This may enhance the physiological benefits of exercise for stress resilience.
Amano, M., et al. 2001. Exercise training and autonomic nervous system activity in obese individuals. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33 (8), 1287-91.
Amat, J., et al. 2006. Previous experience with behavioral control under stress blocks the behavioral and dorsal raphe nucleus activating effects of later uncontrollable stress: Role of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neurosicence, 26 (51), 13264-72.
Aubert, G., & Lansdorp, P.M. 2008. Telomeres and aging. Physiological Reviews, 88 (2), 557-79.
Blackburn, E., & Epel, E. 2012. Psychological stress and telomeres. Nature, 490, 169-71.
Castello, V., et al. 2011. Impact of aerobic exercise training on heart rate variability and functional capacity in obese women after gastric bypass surgery. Obesity Surgery, 21 (11), 1739-49.
Cherkas, L.F., et al. 2008. The association between physical activity in leisure time and leukocyte telomere length. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168 (2), 154-58.
Dedert, E.A., et al. 2010. Posttraumatic stress disorder, cardiovascular, and metabolic disease: A review of the evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39 (1), 61-78.
de Souza, N.M., et al. 2012. Heart rate variability in obese children. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 22 (3), 328-33.
Dishman, R.K., et al. 2006. Neurobiology of exercise. Obesity, 14 (3), 345-56.
Earnest, C.P., et al. 2008. Heart rate variability characteristics in sedentary postmenopausal women following six months of exercise training: The DREW study. PLoS One, 3 (6), e2288.
Epel, E. 2012. How “reversible” is telomeric aging? Cancer Prevention Research, 5 (10), 1163-68.
Fleshner, M., et al. 2011. The neurobiology of the stress-resistant brain. Stress, 14 (5), 498-502.
Fu, C.-H., et al. 2008. Alteration of cardiovascular autonomic functions by vegetarian diets in postmenopausal women is related to LDL cholesterol levels. The Chinese Journal of Physiology, 51 (2), 100-105.
Fyhrquist, F., & Saijonmaa, O. 2012. Telomere length and cardiovascular aging. Annals of Medicine, 44 (S1), 138-42.
Ganzel, B.L., Morris, P.A., & Wethington, E. 2010. Allostasis and the human brain: Integrating models of stress from the social and life sciences. Psychological Review, 117 (1), 134-74.
Greenwood, B.N., et al. 2012. The protective effects of voluntary exercise against the behavioral consequences of uncontrollable stress persist despite an increase in anxiety following forced cessation of exercise. Behavioural Brain Research, 233, 314-21.
Hackney, A.C. 2006. Exercise as a stressor to the human neuroendocrine system. Medicina, 42 (10), 788-97.
Head, D., Singh, T., & Bugg, J.M. 2012. The moderating role of exercise on stress-related effects on the hippocampus and memory in later adulthood. Neuropsychology, 26 (2), 133-43.
Heydari, M., Boutcher, Y.N., & Boutcher, S.H. 2012. High-intensity intermittent exercise and cardiovascular and autonomic function. Clinical Autonomic Research, 1-9.
Hölzel, B.K., et al. 2011. How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6 (6), 537-59.
Jacobs, T.L., et al. 2011. Intensive meditation training, immune cell telomerase activity, and psychological mediators. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36 (5), 664-81.
Krauss, J., et al. 2011. Physical fitness and telomere length in patients with coronary heart disease: Findings from the Heart and Soul Study. PloS one, 6 (11), e26983.
Lavretsky, H., et al. 2013. A pilot study of yogic meditation for family dementia caregivers with depressive symptoms: Effects on mental health, cognition, and telomerase activity. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28 (1), 57-65.
Lin, J., Epel, E., & Blackburn, E. 2012. Telomeres and lifestyle factors: Roles in cellular aging. Mutation Research, 730, 85-89.
Ludlow, A.T., & Roth, S.M. 2011. Physical activity and telomere biology: Exploring the link with aging-related disease prevention. Journal of Aging Research. doi: 10.4061/2011/790378.
Ludlow, A.T., et al. 2008. Relationship between physical activity level, telomere length, and telomerase activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40 (10), 1764-71.
Mattson, M.P. 2008. Hormesis defined. Ageing Research Review, 7 (1), 1–7.
McEwen, B.S. 2006. Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840 (1), 33-44.
McEwen, B.S. 2012. The ever-changing brain: Cellular and molecular mechanisms for the effects of stressful experiences. Developmental Neurobiology, 72 (6), 878-90.
McEwen, B.S., & Gianaros, P.J. 2010. Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: Links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186 (1), 190-222.
Mirabello, L., et al. 2009. The association between leukocyte telomere length and cigarette smoking, dietary and physical variables, and risk of prostate cancer. Aging Cell, 8 (4), 405-13.
O’Keefe, J.H., & Lavie, C.J. 2012. Run for your life . . . at a comfortable speed and not too far. Heart. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012.302886.
O’Keefe, J.H., et al. 2012. Potential adverse cardiovascular effects from excessive endurance exercise. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 87 (6), 587-95.
Puterman, E., et al. 2010. The power of exercise: Buffering the effect of chronic stress on telomere length. PLoS One, 5 (5), e10837.
Radak, Z., et al. 2008. Exercise, oxidative stress and hormesis. Ageing Research Reviews, 7 (1), 34-42.
Radtke, T., et al. 2012. Physical activity intensity and surrogate markers for cardiovascular health in adolescents. European Journal of Applied Physiology. doi: 10.1007/soo421.012.2542.2.
Rothman, S.M., & Mattson, M.P. 2012. Activity-dependent, stress-responsive BDNF signaling and the quest for optimal brain health and resilience throughout the lifespan. Neuroscience. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.10.014.
Routledge, F.S., et al. 2010. Improvements in heart rate variability with exercise therapy. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 26 (6), 303-12.
Savela, S., et al. 2013. Physical activity in midlife and telomere length measured in old age. Experimental Gerontology. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.003.
Souza, G.G.L., et al. 2007. Resilience and vagal tone predict cardiac recovery from acute social stress. Stress, 10 (4), 368-74.
Stapelberg, N.J., et al. 2012. Mind and heart: Heart rate variability in major depressive disorder and coronary heart disease—a review and recommendations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46 (10), 946-57.
Stranahan, A.M., & Mattson, M.P. 2012. Recruiting adaptive cellular stress responses for successful brain ageing. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 13 (3), 209-16.
Tang, Y.Y., et al. 2009. Central and autonomic nervous system interaction is altered by short-term meditation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (22), 8865-70.
Thayer, J.F., et al. 2011. A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36 (2), 747-56.
Thayer, J.F., Yamamoto, S.S., & Brosschot, J.F. 2010. The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability and cardiovascular disease risk factors. International Journal of Cardiology, 141 (2), 122-31.
Walsh, N.P., et al. 2011a. Position statement. Part one: Immune function and exercise. Exercise Immunology Review, 17, 6-63.
Walsh, N.P., et al. 2011b. Position statement. Part two: Maintaining immune health. Exercise Immunology Review, 17, 64-103.
Willeit, P., et al. 2010. Telomere length and risk of incident cancer and cancer mortality. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304 (1), 69-75.
Wu, S.D., & Lo, P.-C. 2008. Inward-attention meditation increases parasympathetic activity: A study based on heart rate variability. Biomedical Research, 29 (5), 245-50.
Yaffe, K., et al. 2011. Telomere length and cognitive function in community-dwelling elders: Findings from the Health ABC Study. Neurobiology of Aging, 32 (11), 2055-60.