I have a client who is kyphotic as well as slightly swayback whose physical therapist has prescribed roman chair back extensions. Personally, I think those exercises are for advanced exercisers and as a pilates instructor as well as personal trainer, I’m sure my client is more likely to end up with low back pain. Any comments?
I have to agree with Shawn! Here are two great articles that were recently released in the IDEA Fitness Journal regarding the topics of Swayback posture vs. lordosis and appropriate program design:
If you don’t have access to these articles drop me a message and I can send them to you through Fitness Connect.
The primary reason that I do not select the Roman Chair for the majority of the population is because of the fulcrum (pivot point) of the machine. Many people don’t consciously think about how much additional force is required to extend the spine as the fulcrum (in this case the resting pad) moves towards the feet. Rather than move the resting pad forward (towards the head) many people just swing themselves up, thus using momentum, which negates the original intent of the exercise. Additionally, I’ve experienced problems with clients that have blood pressure issues. If inversion is something they’re not accustomed to, I would also stay away from the chair.
Honestly, a Swiss Ball or a BOSU™ Balance Trainer (dome side up) will do the trick. There’s not quite as much gluteal activation with these pieces of equipment but you can make subtle adjustments to compensate for that. Not to mention- It’s a heck of a lot more comfortable :o)
Hope that helps!