Calorie Burning: It's Time To Think "Outside The Box"
Optimize energy expenditure with these 7 programs that burn a lot of calories.
Many people engage in aerobic activities to advance their health status, lessen disease risk, modify body composition, reduce stress and improve cardiovascular fitness.
There are numerous exercise devices and modes to choose from that help them achieve these goals. Fitness professionals and personal trainers are continually seeking new and better programs to help clients attain their aerobic activity goals and maximize the caloric expenditure in their endurance workouts. This article offers multiple calorie-burning program options that exercise specialists can use with their students.
The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM 2006) classifies aerobic exercise modes according to their skill demands. Activities are divided into three groups. Group 1 activities can be readily maintained at a consistent intensity, and energy expenditure does not vary much with skill level. Exercise modes in this group include walking, stationary cycling, running, machine-based stair climbing and elliptical training. Group 2 activities can also provide a constant intensity for a given individual, but the rate of energy expenditure varies a lot depending on the person’s performance ability; a person with higher skill levels can work harder and longer and will consequently burn more calories. Group 2 activities include high-low, step and water aerobics, outdoor cycling, hiking, swimming and inline skating. With Group 3 activities, both intensity and skill are highly variable, and performance demands greatly affect energy expenditure; examples of these activities include basketball, racquet sports and volleyball.
Other factors to consider when selecting a mode of exercise for a client include personal interest, equipment availability, physical needs and injury risk. For long-term cardiovascular health and caloric expenditure, it is practical to select a variety of physical activities and exercise modes that sufficiently stimulate the heart, lungs and muscles.
A major way to maximize energy expenditure is to vary, and progressively increase, the intensity of the exercise. (See the sidebars “Measuring Caloric Expenditure” and “Determining Caloric Expenditure During Exercise” for more detailed information about measuring and determining caloric expenditure during exercise.) It is important to choose a mode of exercise that can be adjusted or graded to overload the cardiorespiratory system. For instance, treadmill walking can be made much more challenging by increasing the grade or speed. Cycling intensity can be made more demanding by increasing the pedaling resistance. In addition, choosing a mode that allows for high-intensity intervals to be rapidly interspersed with low- to moderate-intensity intervals is beneficial and effective.
It may be helpful to educate clients and students that additional health and fitness benefits will be attained as the exercise intensity increases (Swain & Franklin 2006). Swain and Franklin conclude that there are greater cardioprotective benefits (lowered risk of coronary heart disease, hypertension, stroke, diabetes and other associated diseases) from higher aerobic exercise intensities than there are from moderate intensities. Practically sp-eaking, Swain and Franklin’s review indicates that introducing a progressive increase in exercise intensity as a client’s fitness level improves is a relevant health-promoting pro-gram design initiative to keep in mind when working with students of all fitness levels.
Some exercise modes—such as swimming, rowing, simulated skiing and working with some elliptical cross-training products—involve both the upper- and lower-body muscles. Although these types of exercise engage more muscles, they do not necessarily engage as much muscle mass as running, a “lower-body-only” exercise mode, and so will burn fewer calories at a similar level of intensity (Kravitz et al. 1997b).
Some exercisers choose to carry handheld weights in the hope of enhancing energy expenditure when walking or running. Although the use of handheld weights slightly increases the exercise intensity, research reveals that this additional equipment does not elicit greater improvement in overall aerobic capacity (Kravitz et al. 1997a). On the other hand, swimmers, who incur much less pressure on the bones and joints, can exercise for a longer period of time, thus possibly meeting or exceeding the energy expenditure of some higher-intensity workouts. Some “upper- and lower-body” exercise modes, such as simulated skiing, require a fairly proficient skill development phase before the energy expenditure benefits can be fully realized.
Cycling and recumbent cycling are two very popular non-weight-bearing exercise modes, whereas walking and jogging are popular weight-bearing exercises. At the same level of intensity, most people will expend modestly more calories performing a weight-bearing activity (Kravitz et al. 1997b). An additional benefit of weight-bearing exercise is maintaining bone mass and preventing osteoporosis. With cycling and recumbent cycling, however, there is much less trauma to the muscles and joints, and heart rate is generally lower; thus, longer exercise bouts are possible. Alternating weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing activities, as well as “upper- and lower-body” and “lower-body-only” modes, may be the most beneficial strategy for preventing overuse problems, promoting positive health outcomes and motivating clients to adhere to their exercise programs.
There are countless ways to create, modify and combine exercise programs to burn an ample amount of calories. Seven are presented here. For each program presented, personal trainers and other fitness professionals are encouraged to modify the elements appropriately for clients’ fitness levels and specific needs. Workout frequency is not reported, in order to let each exercise professional determine what is suitable for his or her clients. Doing back-to-back, high-intensity workouts during a week of training is not recommended, as that can lead to overtraining and overuse injuries.
To bring together these seven different program ideas, widespread Internet searching in empirical and scientific databases was initially completed using several key words and phrases, such as interval training, high-intensity interval training, supramaximal interval training, best calorie-burning workouts, endurance training, optimal cardiovascular exercise workouts, excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), maximizing oxygen consumption and more.
High-intensity aerobic interval training (popularly known as HIT or HIIT) is described as a compromise between sustained moderate-intensity training (MIT) and sprint interval training (SIT).
Study: Perry et al. 2008.
Protocol: Study subjects completed 10 exercise intervals lasting 4 minutes, interspersed with 2-minute exercise-free rest intervals.
Intensity: Subjects were at 95% of their actual heart rate max during the 4-minute intervals, which would be analogous to 17–18 on the RPE scale.
Mode: Most exercise modes can be used for this program.
Duration: This total workout takes close to 1 hour to complete.
Comments: Perry and colleagues demonstrated that this HIT program resulted in significant whole-body and skeletal muscle capacities to oxidize (burn) fat and carbohydrate in previously trained individuals. Other recent research with a similar protocol has shown very similar results (Talanian et al. 2007). During the 2-minute rest period, light exercise (as opposed to passive rest) may be a preferred option to consider. Modify intensity appropriately for clients.
Traditional circuit training programs incorporate 9–12 exercise stations per circuit. Participants move from one station to the next with little (15–30 seconds) or no rest, performing a 15- to 45-second work bout of 8–20 repetitions at each station. Resistances range from 40% to 60% of one-repetition maximum (1–RM).
Study: Gotchalk, Berger & Kraemer 2004.
Protocol: In the study, the circuit consisted of 10 repetitions of the following: leg press, bench press, leg curl, latissimus pull-down, arm curl, seated shoulder press, triceps push-down, upright row, leg extension and seated row. Subjects completed 5 circuits. All repetitions were performed at a cadence of 40 reps per minute, with 2- to 5-second rests between exercises (the time needed to move quickly to the next station).
Intensity: Subjects trained at 40% of their 1-RM, analogous to training at a light to moderate perceived intensity level for each exercise.
Mode: This workout can be performed on most exercise equipment available in a weight training facility.
Duration: The total workout takes approximately 17–20 minutes to complete.
Comments: In designing high-volume continuous circuit resistance training programs, alternate upper- and lower-body joint actions to provide an optimal muscle recovery in this swiftly moving program. Since the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale is not defined for resistance training exercises, guide clients to their personal light to moderate level for each exercise. For muscular balance about a joint, try to incorporate opposite-action exercises (e.g., flexion and extension at the elbow). Giving preference to multijoint exercises (which involve more muscle mass) over single-joint exercises should result in a higher caloric yield. Gotchalk, Berger & Kraemer showed that performing this circuit of exercises at the specified level of intensity elicited oxygen consumption values (39%–51.5% of VO2max) that met ACSM’s exercise intensity guidelines (40%–85% of VO2maxR) for cardiorespiratory fitness (ACSM 2006).
Paton and Hopkins (2004) classify training bouts based on intensity, with specific durations, as follows: supramaximal training (also known as sprint interval training) is all-out cardiovascular effort lasting less than 2 minutes. Maximal training is maximal-effort aerobic exercise lasting 2–10 minutes. Submaximal exercise is an exertion lasting more than 10 minutes at a pace close to the anaerobic threshold. These authors further describe the anaerobic threshold as an intensity that can be sustained for approximately 45 minutes.
Study: Burgomaster et al. 2008.
Protocol: Subjects in this study completed 4–6 sprint (or supramaximal) intervals lasting 30 seconds each, interspersed with 4.5 minutes of light exercise at a self-selected pace.
Intensity: Subjects performed the sprint intervals at an all-out effort, which suggests an 18–20 RPE level.
Mode: Most exercise modes can be used for this training.
Duration: This total workout takes 20–30 minutes for the 4–6 sprint intervals, respectively.
Comments: Burgomaster and colleagues demonstrated that short-duration SIT training produces cellular fat metabolism adaptations similar to those produced by traditional endurance programs. A secondary benefit of SIT training is that it elicits exercise-afterburn-of-calories (EPOC) values that are twice as great as those elicited by submaximal training bouts (Laforgia et al. 1997). Reminder: this workout involves a very forceful effort bout, which can easily be modified as needed to a much less vigorous exertion for clients. During the self-selected 4.5-minute recovery exercise period, an RPE of 8–9 units is appropriate.
Fartlek training was developed in the 1930s in Sweden. Fartlek means “speed play” in Swedish. The program combines bouts of continuous and interval training of various lengths and intensities. This type of training stresses both the aerobic and anaerobic energy pathways. There are many variations of this training, but little data-based research on it.
Study: No citation.
Protocol: Randomize 2-, 4- or 6-minute bouts of exercise on different pieces of equipment, changing modes, intensities and duration in an unstructured or random order. Below is an example with a treadmill, an elliptical trainer and a cycle ergometer:
Rotation 1: treadmill (2 minutes), elliptical trainer (4 minutes), cycle ergometer (6 minutes);
Rotation 2: elliptical trainer (6 minutes), cycle ergometer (4 minutes), treadmill (2 minutes);
Rotation 3: cycle ergometer (4 minutes), treadmill (4 minutes), cycle ergometer (4 minutes).
Intensity: For the 2-minute duration, the client trains at an RPE of 15 (hard); for the 4-minute duration, at an RPE of 13 (somewhat hard); and for the 6-minute duration, at an RPE of 12 (between light and somewhat hard).
Mode: Fartlek training uses multiple modes; specifics depend primarily on availability.
Duration: The duration should follow ACSM (2006) guidelines, which recommend 20–60 minutes of continuous cardiorespiratory exercise.
Comments: Indoor Fartlek play training adds variety and fun to a workout because it can be constantly changing. Fitness professionals are empowered to take this randomized and unstructured training concept and develop other variations.
Metabolic sports conditioning specifically addresses the intensity, the duration and the aerobic and anaerobic characteristics of the specific sport (Gamble 2007). Prolonged sessions of moderate-intensity exercise lasting ≥ 60 minutes at 65% of peak oxygen uptake have been shown to significantly improve endurance capacity and whole-body carbohydrate and fat oxidation (Burgomaster et al. 2008).
Study: Burgomaster et al. 2008.
Protocol: Subjects performed continuous submaximal aerobic exercise on cycle ergometers.
Intensity: Intensity was 65% of VO2peak, equivalent to an RPE of about 14 (somewhat hard).
Mode: Most exercise modes can be used for this training.
Duration: The workout, consisting of sustained cardiorespiratory exercise, lasts 40–60 minutes.
Comments: Long, slow distance-training protocols are a foundation in strategies that elicit shifts toward improved fat and carbohydrate metabolism. Quinn, Vroman and Kertzer (1994) showed that 60 minutes of sustained aerobic exercise (at 70% VO2max) resulted in significantly higher EPOC than did 20- and 40-minute protocols at the same intensity.
The step-wise program proves to be an interesting new variation on endurance training.
Study: Jacobs & Sjödin 1985.
Protocol: Subjects exercised on a cycle or treadmill for 5 minutes at a relatively easy workload (cardiovascular warm-up) and then increased intensity about 10%–15%. At the end of each subsequent 4-minute exercise stage, they again increased their workload about 10%–15%.
Intensity: The initial work intensity elicited an RPE of about 11. Then, the intensity increased roughly 1 RPE level for each subsequent 4-minute stage (i.e., the program started at an RPE of 11; after 4 minutes the intensity became a 12; after another 4 minutes the intensity became a 13; etc.). Intensity was increased by varying speed, grade or stride, depending on the mode used.
Mode: Most exercise modes can be used for this program.
Duration: Duration should follow ACSM (2006) guidelines, which recommend 20–60 minutes of continuous cardiorespiratory exercise.
Comments: The idea of employing a step-wise interval training program was of great interest to the researchers in terms of studying muscle enzyme and blood lactate responses to progressively increasing exercise intensities. As a training program this concept provides a unique interval program that adds variety and challenge to a cardiorespiratory workout. This type of program can be halted when a particular intensity level is reached or a specific duration is attained.
The researchers in this investigation showed that vigorous-intensity exercise is more effective than moderate-intensity exercise for improving maximal aerobic capacity in a healthy adult population at low risk for cardiovascular disease. Also, this study adds to the mounting body of data indicating that higher-intensity exercise leads to potentially greater benefits in cardiovascular health compared with moderate-intensity exercise (Swain & Franklin 2006).
Study: Gormley et al. 2008.
Protocol: The subjects did a 5-minute cardiovascular warm-up, which transitioned into interval training consisting of 5-minute work intervals at a near-maximal intensity followed by 5-minute recovery intervals at a low level of work. In this study, the subjects repeated the near-maximal and recovery interval sequence 5 times (for a total of 55 minutes, including the warm-up).
Intensity: The 5-minute warm-up was completed at 75% of the subjects’ heart rate reserve (HRR), which would be almost 15 on the RPE scale. The near-maximal interval was at about 95% of the subjects’ HRR, or around 17–18 on the RPE scale. The recovery interval was at 50% HRR, in the region of a 12–13 on the RPE scale.
Mode: Most exercise modes can be used for this program.
Duration: This total workout takes 55 minutes.
Comments: The researchers did 2 weeks of progressively increasing cardiovascular training before the subjects (aged 18–44), who had no more than one risk factor for coronary heart disease, completed this study. As has been stated a few times in this article, modify appropriately for the fitness-level needs of students and clients.
As researchers and practitioners continue to discover new ways to challenge the human body, novel and unique training programs will emerge. Go ahead—give these ideas a chance and “think outside the box.”
For the latest research, statistics, sample classes, and more, "Like" IDEA on Facebook here.
Baar, K. 2006. Training for endurance and strength: Lessons from cell signaling. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38 (11), 1939–44.
Burgomaster, K., et al. 2008. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1, 151–60.
Elia, M. 1999. Organ and tissue contribution to metabolic weight. In J.M. Kinney & H.N. Tucker (Eds.), Energy Metabolism: Tissue Determinants and Cellular Corollaries (pp. 61–79). New York: Raven Press.
Gamble, P. 2007. Challenges and game-related solutions to metabolic conditioning for team sports. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 29 (4), 60–65.
Gormley, S.E., et al. 2008. Effect of intensity of aerobic training on VO2max. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40 (7), 1336–43.
Gotshalk, L.A., Berger, R.A., & Kraemer, W.J. 2004. Cardiovascular responses to a high-volume continuous circuit resistance training protocol. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18 (4), 760–64.
Jacobs, I., & Sjödin, B. 1985. Relationship of ergometer-specific VO2max and muscle enzymes to blood lactate during submaximal exercise. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 19 (2), 77–80.
Kravitz, L., et al. 1997a. Does step exercise with handweights enhance training effects? Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 11 (3), 194–99.
Kravitz, L., et al. 1997b. Exercise mode and gender comparisons of energy expenditure at self-selected intensities. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 29 (8), 1028–35.
Laforgia, J., et al. 1997. Comparison of energy expenditure elevations after submaximal and supramaximal running. Journal of Applied Physiology, 82 (2), 661–66.
Paton, C.D., & Hopkins, W.G. 2004. Effects of high-intensity training on performance and physiology of endurance athletes. Sportscience, 8, 25–40. http://sportsci.org/jour/
04/cdp.htm; retrieved Jan. 17, 2009.
Perry, C.G.R., et al. 2008. High-intensity aerobic interval training increases fat and carbohydrate metabolic capacities in human skeletal muscle. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 33, 1112–23.
Quinn, T.J., Vroman, N.B., & Kertzer, R. 1999. Postexercise oxygen consumption in trained females: Effect of exercise duration. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 26 (7), 908–913.
Swain, D.P., & Franklin, B.A. 2006. Comparison of cardioprotective benefits of vigorous versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise. American Journal of Cardiology, 97 (1), 141–47.
Talanian, J.L., et al. 2007. Two weeks of high-intensity aerobic interval training increases the capacity for fat oxidation during exercise in women. Journal of Applied Physiology, 102, 1439–47.
© 2009 by IDEA Health & Fitness Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.