Question asked by Joanne Duncan-Carnesciali 332 days ago
Is there a difference between a way health fitness specialist approaches exercise programming as opposed to a personal trainer?
As far as outcomes/results are concerned, is there a difference in the way a health fitness specialist approaches exercise programming as opposed to a personal trainer?
Answers (5)
0
I saw the responses to your question on the difference between 'personal trainer' and 'health fitness specialist', and it seemed to me that it is very much left to the individuals what they call themselves.
In my private business, I call myself a 'Personal Fitness Trainer', at the facility where I teach classes, I am refered to as a 'Wellness Instructor'. One of my certifications calls me a 'Lifestyle and Weight management Coach'.
I do not have different approaches because rather than wearing different hats, I am wearing one hat with several sides.
Until such time that there are defined job descriptions that separate the two terms in quantifiable ways, I see no difference.
In my private business, I call myself a 'Personal Fitness Trainer', at the facility where I teach classes, I am refered to as a 'Wellness Instructor'. One of my certifications calls me a 'Lifestyle and Weight management Coach'.
I do not have different approaches because rather than wearing different hats, I am wearing one hat with several sides.
Until such time that there are defined job descriptions that separate the two terms in quantifiable ways, I see no difference.
0
No difference in the way I approach any client, it is the objective and subjective information gathered that deternime how I approach training someone.

I consider heath and "general fitness" the same thing..the goal is the same better health in general.
With that being said subjective and objective do change starting points and help to set training boundries, but the principle is the same.
Now if you are talking about working with chronic diseases or illnesses such as heart disease, DVA, TIA, Stroke, Cancer, etc., then there is a difference in outcome based programming. Now we are looking at a dose/response program based on restoring as much affected function as possible instead of looking to just increase general fitness. The programs would need to based on ACSM's Exercise Management for Persons with Chronic Diseases and Disabilities and ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Perscription 8th ed..
Again the principle is the same though even if working with this type of client or any type of client. We are still staying within the boundries set by the initial subjective and objective assessements.
That is not only outside of my scope of practice, but I have no interest in working with that population.
With that being said subjective and objective do change starting points and help to set training boundries, but the principle is the same.
Now if you are talking about working with chronic diseases or illnesses such as heart disease, DVA, TIA, Stroke, Cancer, etc., then there is a difference in outcome based programming. Now we are looking at a dose/response program based on restoring as much affected function as possible instead of looking to just increase general fitness. The programs would need to based on ACSM's Exercise Management for Persons with Chronic Diseases and Disabilities and ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Perscription 8th ed..
Again the principle is the same though even if working with this type of client or any type of client. We are still staying within the boundries set by the initial subjective and objective assessements.
That is not only outside of my scope of practice, but I have no interest in working with that population.
Comment by Shawn Fears 329 days ago
Wanting to increase muscular endurance or one arm pushups is not "general fitness" to me by any means, its very specific not general fitness. No, to me they are the same thing, health and general fitness are interchangable for example the first thing done when I train for general fitness is address health concerns(as uncovered in the assessment questionaire) then take a client as far as they want to go with their fitness....the same thing I have done working with diabetic clients. To be able to better handle activities of daily living and increase the quality of life is the priority then progress from there.
I know ACSM makes that differentiation between the two credentials from studying their reference books at CALU. But this question was in reference to differences to program approaches, and I don't differ. I think that both start at the same place..health outcomes then the category can change to improve fitness instead of health or general fitness.
I absolutely agree with your last statement about progressing from health to improving fitness for some special populations.
I guess to me general fitness is working on all fitness components for health reasons which is where my line of thinking comes from.
I know ACSM makes that differentiation between the two credentials from studying their reference books at CALU. But this question was in reference to differences to program approaches, and I don't differ. I think that both start at the same place..health outcomes then the category can change to improve fitness instead of health or general fitness.
I absolutely agree with your last statement about progressing from health to improving fitness for some special populations.
I guess to me general fitness is working on all fitness components for health reasons which is where my line of thinking comes from.
Comment by Shawn Fears 329 days ago
0
No I don't believe there is a difference in the approach of exercise programming although I believe that the HFS may come in contact with a wider variety of clients depending on where they may be employed on staff.
I am employed as a HFS in a corporate wellness center and found that I spend a great deal more time in educating our members whether it be about skin cancer, high blood pressure or other various health-related issues. When doing personal training, I find that we concentrate more on physical training... but that's my personal opinion.
I am employed as a HFS in a corporate wellness center and found that I spend a great deal more time in educating our members whether it be about skin cancer, high blood pressure or other various health-related issues. When doing personal training, I find that we concentrate more on physical training... but that's my personal opinion.

Answered by Anonymous
223 days ago
0
I, Rowan Hill, am an ACE Certified Personal Trainer and an ACE "Advanced Health and Fitness Specialist" in the beautiful state of Florida. Although I believe that the ACE-AHFS course is a good one and covers a little bit of many of the various aspects of fitness, I do not believe that this cours makes me an ADVANCED fitness specialist. Basically, what it does is make me legally defensible as I do personal training and pre and post-rehabilitative exercises and/or exercise regimens with my clients.
What MIGHT make me and advanced health and fitness specialist is 8 years as a licensed massage therapist specializing in the medical aspects of massage in combination with other valuable experience such as follows. In understanding the roles and functions of the myofascia, compensatory patterns and stretching and strengthening exercises to overcome them as well as using intuition and feedback from my client to aid in overcoming obstacles in his or her program, I become more than a trainer; I specialize. Through conferring with D.O's, other advanced trainers and physical therapists, I advance my knowledge and become advanced. I also believe that continuing education through CEC/CEU programs is important, but pales in comparison to the research that has to be done on a regular basis to stay abreast of what is new in the indstry.
Just a quick thought or two! Nothing makes you advanced, except advancing your knowledge base and sphere of influence!
What MIGHT make me and advanced health and fitness specialist is 8 years as a licensed massage therapist specializing in the medical aspects of massage in combination with other valuable experience such as follows. In understanding the roles and functions of the myofascia, compensatory patterns and stretching and strengthening exercises to overcome them as well as using intuition and feedback from my client to aid in overcoming obstacles in his or her program, I become more than a trainer; I specialize. Through conferring with D.O's, other advanced trainers and physical therapists, I advance my knowledge and become advanced. I also believe that continuing education through CEC/CEU programs is important, but pales in comparison to the research that has to be done on a regular basis to stay abreast of what is new in the indstry.
Just a quick thought or two! Nothing makes you advanced, except advancing your knowledge base and sphere of influence!






