Important Professional Concern---Supplements---My Blog---And a Concerned Blog Reader
I received a disturbing email just today from a concerned blog reader. She sent the following email through Fitness Connect. "The FACT you have on your page about supplements being unregulated is false. Go to the FDA webpage and read about the DSHEA Act of 1994 and the regulation of dietary supplements. You are misinforming your readers!"
It is very, very important to me that my readers are served in the best way I can serve them. Considering that this person did not offer any professional credentials to me, or offer any reason why she is qualified to make such a judgment, I have decided to leave this issue up to the very qualified, and verified fitness professionals on IDEA ANSWERS. Help me out here. The blog and fact she is referring to can be found here: http://blog.ideafit.com/blogs/marlan-eller/supplements-what-your-persona......
The information that this concerned individual has addressed with me can be found here: http://www.fda.gov/food/dietarysupplements/default.htm
In addition to the fda.gov link, please read the frequently requested information questions that are related to this issue. These can be found below the information on DSHEA. The two questions of concern to me are "What is FDA's role in regulating dietary supplements versus the manufacturer's responsibility for marketing them?" and "Who has the responsibility for ensuring that a dietary supplement is safe?" Clicking on these questions will lead you to an "Overview of Dietary Supplements." I suggest strongly that everyone read this (The FDA position) before offering an opinion.
I would like to discuss this matter in depth, and if possible, come to a group consensus about this matter once and for all (have I misinformed my readers? OR is further clarification needed when I address these matters?). I will share my view on this after there have been answers posted. I want to get a fair assessment from the professional community with the information at hand.
Thank you, in advance, for your thoughtful responses. Please don't hold back, but keep it professional. It's very important to me that my information accurate, and if I have erred here, I need to know how to correct it. I am trusting you all with helping me to correct any misinformation that might be being disseminated on my part.
Answers (4)
"A dietary supplement as defined by the DSHEA of 1994 is a product (than tobacco) intended to supplement the diet that contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: vitamin, mineral, herb or other botanical, amino acid, dietary substance to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or a combination of any of the above ingredients. Dietary supplements are not intended to be used as a food or as a sole item of a meal or diet, and these products must be labeled as a dietary supplement."
"Under DSHEA the supplement manufacturer is responsible for the safety of the product. However, the supplement manufacturer is not required to test its products for safety, nor does it have to prove that the supplement does what it claims to do."
In response to the question posed in the textbook, "What are the regulations governing dietary supplements?"
"Supplements are not drugs. Drugs are intended to cure, treat or prevent disease. Drugs must undergo extensive studies of safety and effectiveness, drug interactions, and dosing effects and must have formal FDA approval prior to marketing the product. On the other hand, dietary supplements do not have to undergo any studies on safety or efficacy prior to entering the market. Supplements are also not food additives, which require testing prior to entering the food marketplace. Dietary supplements containing any new ingredient do not require testing. The manufacturer gathers and interprets safety and efficacy information, and them must submit the product and safety information, and the must submit the product and safety information to the FDA 75 days prior to marketing the product. After the 75-day waiting period the supplement can be placed on the market. However, the FDA does not approve the new ingredient. New supplements that do not contain any new ingredients do not have to submit anything to the FDA prior to marketing the product."
Please excuse this lengthy post, however, I hope it is helpful to you.

"FDA is responsible for taking action against any unsafe dietary supplement product after it reaches the market."
Perhaps you should reword the blog statement more specifically to say the supplements are "not regulated by the FDA before they reach the market." Hope this helps the discussion.
Straight off of the most frequently asked questions from your link. They seem to spell it out with "...,there are no provisions in the law for FDA to "approve" dietary supplements for safety of effectiveness before they reach the consumer"
Seems pretty clear cut to me..they DON"T regulate supplements. I would quote and cite this type of information in this and other blogs in the future. It is never enough to state something that challenges somebodies core values without in your fact proof. Your blog posted a list of fact but no works cited...that does not convey accurate information it makes it an opinion and a strong one at that. Anything that has "fact" in it needs to have a source. If you had done this you wouldn't have had a problem.
You're right Shawn, I wouldn't have had this issue had I included the correct sources for all of that information. I've gone back and edited the blog post to make it read more clearly. I have also added sources of information for the facts that I included. This information should prove much more accurate now.
Thanks for your input here, Shawn. It was much appreciated and very helpful.
I reviewed all the links that you posted and can only agree with the other people who have already answered.
Another thing to consider is that the FDA will only act if there is something being brought against a supplement. Else it can be sold for years, and you can only that it does no harm. There are no requirements that manufacturers prove anything. I could put M&Ms in a bottle and sell them as the latest supplement against male pattern baldness.
I was also wondering what interest the person had who decided to take you to task about your blog. Do you know?
I had a great comment typed up and ready to go, and I submitted it, and then I guess the internet gods decided to strike it down or something because it didn't show up!
In short, I'm not sure what the interest was on her part. I don't know her at all. She did not say anything else in the email other than what was included in the description of the question. I emailed her and told her that I was happy for her concern and that I would look into the issue. I also emailed her and told her that she could follow my progress by coming to this webpage, and I included a link.
My suspicion is that she either does not have a working knowledge of law and did not fully understand the law that she referred me to, or she knows exactly what she's doing and she doesn't understand why I would say that supplements are not regulated. My mistake was that I didn't clarify that statement. I was well aware of the legislation that she mentioned, but I view it like this.... A client is asking me about a supplement. I know this client can go get this supplement at a retail store. I know that there are no guarantees that this supplement manufacturer has regluated itself. Therefore, I'm telling my client that supplements aren't regulated... even though they are regulated in the fact that the FDA can pull a supplement after it's been shown to be harmful.
That was not clear in the blog. I suspect that's what caused the confusion. She is correct in that the information was misleading and since it was stated as a "fact" it did deserve some supporting evidence, and in this case further clarification. I think she could have used more professionalism in her email, but I am happy for her concern, nontheless. This has allowed me to remember to take the stance of an uninformed blog reader. I'm sure she wasn't the only one with that particular concern. =)








